| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Scoop de'Woop
Emino Concepts
   |
Posted - 2008.12.12 05:10:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Etho Demerzel
**snip** Lol, "CCP has it under control". Are you sure you are not a CCP employee? Because to say such a thing after CCP story of having things under control you need to be either utterlly stupid or have yours on the line...**snip**
Oh goodness no! Someone has a different view than you? Git 'im, call 'im a damn CCP employee!
Two wrongs don't make a right and if everyone would chill out we might not have a 46 page (and growing thread) of everyone pointing fingers. |
Scoop de'Woop
Emino Concepts
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 05:18:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Scoop de''Woop on 12/12/2008 05:22:11
Originally by: Devian 666
It's all your fault.
 My bad, will try to avoid sploitin' next time. With all sincerity though, it will take a bit of time to get this sorted out. I am not a CCP fan-boy in the least bit but I also don't expect them to come up with feasible solution within the first 24 hours. Granted, there is something fishy about reports of petitions on this issue years ago.
Edit: Since someone mentioned it earlier, although I think it got removed, look at what happened when the dip****s in Congress gave the money to the banks... no accountability and now no one knows where the money went. Patience is of utmost importance. |
Scoop de'Woop
Emino Concepts
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 07:37:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Etho Demerzel
You are entitled to have your opinion, no matter how wrong it is. But as soon as you decide to share it in a forum, be prepared to have it repudiated.
If you can't bear having your flawed arguments dissected and ridicularized for their inconsistencies, then just abstain yourself from writing.
Now if you have anything to say about the subject at hand, please share your priceless ideas. I am quite sure they will be amusing.
I would really like to perpetuate this cycle of personal attacks and over-aggressiveness by pointing out that you should learn basic English before you start throwing around big words which you aren't using correctly but that would contradict what I said earlier about thinking rationally and calmly.
Oh boy, now look what you made me do. |
Scoop de'Woop
Emino Concepts
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 08:13:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Scoop de''Woop on 12/12/2008 08:15:34
Originally by: Etho Demerzel
You are entitled to have your opinion, no matter how wrong it is. But as soon as you decide to share it in a forum, be prepared to have it repudiated. **started a sentence with a conjunction - while this is changing it is still not standard form**
If you can't bear having your flawed arguments dissected and ridicularized **I think I know what you are going for but that isn't a word as far as I know** for their inconsistencies, then just abstain yourself from writing **abstain yourself isn't proper English**.
Now if you have anything to say about the subject at hand, please share your priceless ideas. I am quite sure they will be amusing. **fragment**
Saying something like "you made me do it" is a colloquial phrase that isn't meant to be taken literally. Of course you didn't make me do it because this is an internet forum where physical contact isn't possible.
Edit: When I say "big" words, I don't necessarily mean that my vocabulary doesn't use these types of words, I mean that they aren't used by most English speakers. Grammar and vocabulary, while similar, are different in that you can have a large vocabulary and terrible grammar. |
Scoop de'Woop
Emino Concepts
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 08:21:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Zerconian
Imo, adding new moons to low-sec won't do much. For a time smaller corporations can horde their profits, but eventually once a larger alliance finds it, it'll quickly be locked down and mined for all its worth.  And no I can't offer a solution to help counter-balance the current roles, but seeding won't do much for the average EVE-citizen.
^^ this. If CCP were to adjust the alchemy reactions to be a bit more in line with regular reaction prices, we wouldn't have as much of a monopolization issue. The last time I checked (and before everyone went crazy buying up high end materials) the alchemy reactions were about 1/8th as profitable as the regular reactions. That being said, I haven't had a problem obtaining dysprosium or promethium at decent prices so I fail to see what alchemy was supposed to do in the first place. |
Scoop de'Woop
Emino Concepts
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 09:03:00 -
[6]
- I admitted that starting a sentence with a conjunction is becoming more acceptable "while this is changing" so I will admit that this is a nitpick.
- Abstain is a verb that is used without an object. You can abstain /from/ doing something but you can't abstain yourself. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/abstain (since we are throwing URLs around)
- A fragment sentence is a fragment. It doesn't mean that I couldn't find anything wrong with it but it does mean that the whole sentence is worded poorly or lacking in some way.
- "Because the only way for a person to make another do something is through physical contact, right?" Do you realize how long just one post would be if every single sentence had to account for every possible meaning that every person might find in it?
- "Regardless, 'You made me do it' was an hypocritical statement." That was not a hypocritical statement. It doesn't relate to my beliefs in any way and it was simply an attempt at humor that you clearly misinterpreted.
- "if you find those words unusual or their use offensive" Never once did I say that the "big" words were unusual to me or that they were offensive in any way, I simply pointed out that the average English speaker will not know what they mean or how to properly use them.
I apologize that this whole issue has been so blown out of proper proportions because clearly the sarcasm in my final sentence "Oh boy, now look what you made me do. (frown face)" was lost to your obviously superior intellectual mind. Unfortunately I will be ending this discussion because 1) it isn't relevant to this thread and 2) I have to continue trying to fix my install of the Eve client which won't launch after the patch. I am sure that any additional I can give to CCP about the issue will be of some help although their hands a bit busy dealing with other, more signifcant issues. |
Scoop de'Woop
Emino Concepts
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 19:42:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Scoop de''Woop on 12/12/2008 19:45:29
Originally by: Demeterus
Originally by: Karina Bellac
I couldn't stomach a full reset.
I, however, would be up for a full asset wipe, but keeping skillpoints.
Well, most people haven't cheated. Most people have played this game with the assumption that there's a level playing field, that risk is indeed a factor and that if you overcome the fear of risk you will be rewarded - or not.
Now, we find that some bastards have found a way to completely negate all the risk, get free playtime, get infinite access to anything that will reduce whatever risk there was left. I say all of Eve declare war on the cheater. Pod them wherever you see them. Let CCP put a billion isk bounty on whoever remains after bans and corporate and alliance wipes.
Let's aggregate the risk for the bastards to a point where the game becomes so dangerous that they can barely undock.
But to wipe the entire player base, that's too much, and if it happens - I'm out.
The characters have already been banned so that their characters are junk. On the issue of removing all of the assets that were built/bought with this ISK, this would also be unfair to any players that have used those assets. In the case of outposts that were built, the outpost may have been taken over by another alliance. Should you punish the new station holder just because the previous alliance built it with dirty ISK? That is just one example of what might happen if CCP goes in with a knife and cuts all of that type of stuff out. I honestly think banning all of the relevant accounts and looking at the petition policies is the only thing they can do that is somewhat fair. Open to other ideas though...
Edit: spelling typo |
Scoop de'Woop
Emino Concepts
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 21:01:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Etho Demerzel
Destroying things that were already taken from them makes no sense at all.
Thank you for repeating what I said.
Originally by: Etho Demerzel
As long as they didn't buy it, for 1 ISK the ton, in which case it is an obvious money laundering scheme, they are innocent and should not be affected. The money they payed should vanish from the cheaters' accounts, though. It is not hard to trace all the money, all that is required is some competence.
This will work quite well. They already do things like this to track down ISK sellers. However, I never said that it was hard. My post was addressing the people that were calling for the reset of 0.0 or the removal of all of the towers in 0.0 or anything similar. |
Scoop de'Woop
Emino Concepts
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 21:04:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Vaarmoth Malinigvious
Checking in on page 58.
So, we guilty yet?
Apparently, BoB was guilty before the thread even started. 
Moar BoB accusations!! |
Scoop de'Woop
Emino Concepts
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 21:06:00 -
[10]
Originally by: XxHey BabyxX
They still have plenty of t2 blueprints and Supercapitals made out of thin air, thanks to the exploit.
No, they were not made out of thin air. T2 blueprints were seeded by research agents and supercapitals have to be built with capital materials. You should probably ease up on the sensational hysteria for a bit. |
Scoop de'Woop
Emino Concepts
|
Posted - 2008.12.12 21:11:00 -
[11]
Originally by: XxHey BabyxX
Originally by: Scoop de'Woop
Originally by: XxHey BabyxX
They still have plenty of t2 blueprints and Supercapitals made out of thin air, thanks to the exploit.
No, they were not made out of thin air. T2 blueprints were seeded by research agents and supercapitals have to be built with capital materials. You should probably ease up on the sensational hysteria for a bit.
They made pleanty of moon materials out of thin air which can be sold for isk.
You know with Isk you can buy stuff like T2 blueprints and capital material.
Then you should have said that as it is more accurate according to game mechanics. |
| |
|